#NationalChiliDay: These are the top 10 chili cities in the U.S.

Big Republican advantages are eroding in the race for House control

The Democratic advantage on the generic congressional ballot has slipped over the last few weeks. But Republicans have gradually lost advantages of their own. 

Slowly but surely, the considerable structural advantages — like incumbency, geography and gerrymandering — that give the Republicans a chance to survive a so-called wave election are fading, giving Democrats a clearer path to a House majority in November. 

The Republicans still retain formidable advantages, enough to win the House while losing the popular vote by a wide margin. But their edge has shrunk considerably over the last few months, and even more over the last few years. 

One way to think about it is how well Democrats would need to do on the generic ballot — a poll question that asks voters whether they’ll vote for Democrats or Republicans for Congress — to win the House. A bigger Republican structural advantage means the GOP can withstand a larger Democratic advantage on the generic ballot. 

By this measure, the Republican advantage has probably dropped by about 2 percentage points since 2014, when Republicans won the party’s largest House majority since 1929. 

Since then, four court rulings have softened or even torn up Republican gerrymanders in four big states: Florida, North Carolina, Virginia and most recently Pennsylvania, where the state Supreme Court struck down the congressional map last month. 

The decisions in Florida, North Carolina and Virginia have already cost the Republicans a net of three House seats while generally eroding their position elsewhere in those states, giving Democrats better opportunities in 2018. 

It’s too early to have a good idea of how much Republicans might lose in Pennsylvania, but it is reasonable to expect that the new map will cost the party at least one seat and erode its position in several others. 

Gerrymandering is not the only reason Democrats are at a disadvantage. Republicans also have the advantage of incumbency, which, on average, allows members to run about 7 percentage points ahead of the national party. 

But Republicans have gradually been losing the advantages of incumbency as well, most obviously because of 34 recent retirements in Republican-held congressional districts. 

Overall, the number of GOP retirements in plausibly competitive districts isn’t extraordinarily high. But some of the Republican retirements have been especially damaging: longtime incumbents who have a tradition of running far ahead of the national party and dissuading strong challengers, like New Jersey’s Frank LoBiondo or Pennsylvania’s Charlie Dent. Their retirements could easily be the difference between a noncompetitive race and a Democratic victory. 

The Republican incumbency advantage has diminished in another way: Democratic recruitment and fundraising. A strong Democratic recruit — like a military veteran or an elected official — can cut into that advantage, especially with strong fundraising numbers. 

As measured by biographical indicators like military experience or past elected officials, Democratic recruitment is only somewhat above average at this stage. But much like the Republican retirements, the best Democratic recruits have often been extremely valuable. 

Often, Democrats have succeeded in finding their very best candidates in white working-class districts where President Donald Trump fared well in 2016. His strength threatened to move many traditional battlegrounds into the Republican column. The Democratic path to a House majority arguably looked even more difficult after the 2016 presidential than it did before — even though Democrats picked up seven seats in that election, since so many traditional battleground districts swung hard for Trump. 

But strong Democratic recruiting in Trump Country has kept many traditional battlegrounds on the list, like Illinois’ 12th or Kentucky’s 6th. The Democrats might have an easier time finding qualified and experienced recruits in white working-class districts in part because Democrats have a track record of winning there, and therefore a deeper bench, even if Trump won a particular district. 

In contrast, the Democrats don’t have much of a bench at all in many of the well-educated but traditionally Republican districts where Trump struggled the most. Here it’s the Democratic fundraising that is most impressive. Last quarter, 134 Democrats in 83 districts raised at least $100,000 in individual contributions. Those successes have been disproportionately concentrated in well-educated areas. 

It’s the working-class districts where Democrats are likeliest to have true recruiting holes, like New York’s 24th or California’s 21st. That might seem somewhat odd because Democrats have had so much success luring top-tier candidates in working-class districts. 

In fact, Democrats do have well-qualified, potential candidates in these districts, like the state Assemblyman Rudy Salas or the former Syracuse Mayor Stephanie Miner, but many aren’t running. (Salas hasn’t entered the race in California’s 21st, and Miner has decided not to run in New York’s 24th.) It seems these areas may not be stocked with ambitious, well-to-do and well-connected liberals eager to run when an elected official doesn’t step forward. 

Even so, Democrats still seem poised to have viable if imperfect candidates in a large number of battleground districts. Upshot estimates indicate that Democrats would need to win the popular vote by 7.4 points — albeit with a healthy margin of error of plus or minus more than 4 points — to take the House. Today, most estimates put the generic congressional ballot very near that number. So far from the election, the fight for control remains a toss-up.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Politics

In world of conspiracy theories, even teenagers aren’t off limits
In world of conspiracy theories, even teenagers aren’t off limits

David Hogg, 17, went from Florida high school student to mass shooting survivor to telegenic advocate for gun-control laws in a few days. And just as quickly, online conspiracy theorists began spinning viral lies attacking the teenager's credibility.  By Wednesday — a week after a gunman wielding a semiautomatic rifle had killed 17 people...
Trump’s solution for school shootings: Arm teachers
Trump’s solution for school shootings: Arm teachers

Seated between teenage survivors of the Florida school shooting, President Donald Trump said during an Oval Office listening session Wednesday that arming teachers and posting gun-toting veterans in schools could deter or stop school shooters.  His comments came during an emotional meeting that included Vice President Mike Pence, Education Secretary...
Trump suggests supporters should pressure Sessions to investigate Obama’s inaction on Russian meddling
Trump suggests supporters should pressure Sessions to investigate Obama’s inaction on Russian meddling

President Donald Trump on Wednesday lashed out at Attorney General Jeff Sessions, suggesting the president's supporters should pressure Sessions to focus the investigation into Russian election meddling on President Barack Obama's administration.  Taking to Twitter, Trump said that the meddling occurred while Obama was in office and asked why...
How will the battle over dreamers end? Here are four scenarios
How will the battle over dreamers end? Here are four scenarios

A deadline to protect hundreds of thousands of young undocumented immigrants is less than two weeks away, and it's looking less and less likely that Washington will act in time to protect them.  So, where does that leave the estimated 700,000 "dreamers" who could face deportation as soon as March 5?  There are a few possibilities...
What Obama did, didn’t do and couldn’t do in response to Russian interference
What Obama did, didn’t do and couldn’t do in response to Russian interference

It's proved hard for social media companies to completely uproot trolls apparently working on behalf of the Russian government. After all, the point of those trolls' activity has been to blend in with regular all-American trolls who have free rein on Twitter and Facebook. Automation is one thing; bots often demonstrate patterns of behavior that set...
More Stories