FOOD NEWS:

#NationalChiliDay: These are the top 10 chili cities in the U.S.

Fake news and bots may be worrisome, but their political power is overblown


How easy is it to change people’s votes in an election? 

The answer, a growing number of studies conclude, is that most forms of political persuasion seem to have little effect at all. 

This conclusion may sound jarring at a time when people are concerned about the effects of the false news articles that flooded Facebook and other online outlets during the 2016 election. Observers speculated that these so-called fake news articles swung the election to Donald Trump. Similar suggestions of large persuasion effects, supposedly pushing Trump to victory, have been made about online advertising from the firm Cambridge Analytica and content promoted by Russian bots. 

Much more remains to be learned about the effects of these types of online activities, but people should not assume they had huge effects. Previous studies have found, for instance, that the effects of even television advertising (arguably a higher-impact medium) are very small. According to one credible estimate, the net effect of exposure to an additional ad shifts the partisan vote of approximately two people out of 10,000. 

In fact, a recent meta-analysis of numerous different forms of campaign persuasion, including in-person canvassing and mail, finds that their average effect in general elections is zero. 

Field experiments testing the effects of online ads on political candidates and issues have also found null effects. We shouldn’t be surprised — it is hard to change people’s minds. Their votes are shaped by fundamental factors like which party they typically support and how they view the state of the economy. “Fake news” and bots are likely to have vastly smaller effects, especially given how polarized our politics have become. 

Here’s what you should look for in evaluating claims about vast persuasion effects from dubious online content: 

— How many people actually saw the questionable material. Many alarming statistics have been produced since the election about how many times “fake news” was shared on Facebook or how many times Russian bots retweeted content on Twitter. These statistics obscure the fact that the content being shared may not reach many Americans (most people are not on Twitter and consume relatively little political news) or even many humans (many bot followers may themselves be bots). 

— Whether the people being exposed are persuadable. Dubious political content online is disproportionately likely to reach heavy news consumers who already have strong opinions. For instance, a study I conducted with Andrew Guess of Princeton and Jason Reifler of the University of Exeter in Britain showed that exposure to fake news websites before the 2016 election was heavily concentrated among the 10 percent of Americans with the most conservative information diets — not exactly swing voters.  

— The proportion of news people saw that is bogus. The total number of shares or likes that fake news and bots attract can sound enormous until you consider how much information circulates online. Twitter, for instance, reported that Russian bots tweeted 2.1 million times before the election — certainly a worrisome number. But these represented only 1 percent of all election-related tweets and 0.5 percent of views of election-related tweets. 

Similarly, my study with Guess and Reifler found that the mean number of articles on fake news websites visited by Trump supporters was 13.1, but only 40 percent of his supporters visited such websites, and they represented only about 6 percent of the pages they visited on sites focusing on news topics. 

None of these findings indicate that fake news and bots aren’t worrisome signs for U.S. democracy. They can mislead and polarize citizens, undermine trust in the media and distort the content of public debate. But those who want to combat online misinformation should take steps based on evidence and data, not hype or speculation.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

In world of conspiracy theories, even teenagers aren’t off limits
In world of conspiracy theories, even teenagers aren’t off limits

David Hogg, 17, went from Florida high school student to mass shooting survivor to telegenic advocate for gun-control laws in a few days. And just as quickly, online conspiracy theorists began spinning viral lies attacking the teenager's credibility.  By Wednesday — a week after a gunman wielding a semiautomatic rifle had killed 17 people...
Trump’s solution for school shootings: Arm teachers
Trump’s solution for school shootings: Arm teachers

Seated between teenage survivors of the Florida school shooting, President Donald Trump said during an Oval Office listening session Wednesday that arming teachers and posting gun-toting veterans in schools could deter or stop school shooters.  His comments came during an emotional meeting that included Vice President Mike Pence, Education Secretary...
Trump suggests supporters should pressure Sessions to investigate Obama’s inaction on Russian meddling
Trump suggests supporters should pressure Sessions to investigate Obama’s inaction on Russian meddling

President Donald Trump on Wednesday lashed out at Attorney General Jeff Sessions, suggesting the president's supporters should pressure Sessions to focus the investigation into Russian election meddling on President Barack Obama's administration.  Taking to Twitter, Trump said that the meddling occurred while Obama was in office and asked why...
How will the battle over dreamers end? Here are four scenarios
How will the battle over dreamers end? Here are four scenarios

A deadline to protect hundreds of thousands of young undocumented immigrants is less than two weeks away, and it's looking less and less likely that Washington will act in time to protect them.  So, where does that leave the estimated 700,000 "dreamers" who could face deportation as soon as March 5?  There are a few possibilities...
What Obama did, didn’t do and couldn’t do in response to Russian interference
What Obama did, didn’t do and couldn’t do in response to Russian interference

It's proved hard for social media companies to completely uproot trolls apparently working on behalf of the Russian government. After all, the point of those trolls' activity has been to blend in with regular all-American trolls who have free rein on Twitter and Facebook. Automation is one thing; bots often demonstrate patterns of behavior that set...
More Stories