You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myDaytonDailyNews.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myDaytonDailyNews.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myDaytonDailyNews.com.

Can Donald Trump turn Bill Clinton into a ‘Bill Cosby’?


Can this campaign get any weirder?

Sensing nothing left to lose, Republican hopeful Donald Trump’s campaign is going for broke with a scorched-earth strategy, intended to make a “Bill Cosby” out of Bill Clinton.

Just as Cosby went from national hero to national pariah after a parade of women charged him with decades of sexually predatory acts, Team Trump hopes to do the same to the former president.

Yes, I know, Bill Clinton’s not running. His wife is. But the Trump campaign aims to smear her as an enabler of sexual violence.

“We’re going to turn him into Bill Cosby,” Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon told staffers, according to a Bloomberg report that quotes two unnamed Trump advisers who were present. “He’s a violent sexual predator who physically abuses women who he assaults. And she takes the lead on the intimidation of the victims.”

One could question whether, with all due respect to the accusers, Team Trump believes in protecting the rights of the accused. But this particular ploy of resurrecting accusations that were investigated but never prosecuted — even by special Whitewater prosecutor Kenneth Starr — at least 20 years ago is not designed to debate our criminal justice system. It is intended to tar the Clintons with crimes against women, a group that turned heavily against Trump even before the new allegations came out.

The new strategy began as a defensive move. Before the second debate, Trump was revealed in a 2005 “Access Hollywood” hot-mic video as boasting about using his celebrity status to go after women like a sexual predator. He apologized for what he called “locker room talk” and accused Bill Clinton of doing worse as president.

With his polls having shrunk to little more than his hardcore base of supporters and Election Day fast approaching, Trump and his campaign have pretty much abandoned efforts to reach out to undecided swing voters. Instead, their hope is to discourage wavering young women, in particular, who might be turned off enough to stay home instead of voting for Hillary Clinton.

As someone old enough to remember the 1990s quite well, I don’t think that trick’s going to work any better than the partisan pursuit of President Clinton did.

Now, in the final days of a contest between two candidates with the highest disapproval ratings of two nominees in memory, we can expect the alley fight to get uglier. Yet a ray of sunshine — and sanity — appeared later in the week. First lady Michelle Obama gave a speech on Hillary Clinton’s behalf that seemed to put an overdue moral compass on this competition of scandals.

She put aside her prepared speech, she said, because the idea that “a candidate for President of the United States has bragged about sexually assaulting women” is “not something that we can ignore” or sweep under the rug “as just another disturbing footnote in a sad election season.”

“We have everything we need to stop this madness,” she said to enthusiastic applause. “We have knowledge. We have a voice. We have a vote.”

We also have a remarkably poignant and powerful voice in Michelle Obama. It is no wonder that many people wish that she was on the ballot. But this First Lady has made it clear that she’s had it with Washington’s political circus, an attitude so sensible that, to me, it only makes her sound more attractive for the job.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

FRESH IDEAS: The art of fashion

From Observer: “Historically, fashion has rarely been elevated to the same stature as painting, music, sculpture or architecture. But fashion is one of the purest expressions of art because it is art lived on a daily basis. … The fashion designer creates artwork that needs another person for its completion. … an actor to incarnate...
COMMENTARY: Covering the White House, or trying to

Freedom of the press, in my view, has two parts. First there is the freedom to publish, to criticize and to petition. Then there is the critical issue of the freedom to gather the news — not just to report it but also to gather it. Without the freedom to gather the news, the freedom to print it, broadcast it or comment on it becomes pyrrhic....
Can drug overdoses be ignored?

This headline caught our eye: “Middletown council member: Can we stop responding to overdoses?” Is the best way to handle OD’s to ignore them? Staff writer Ed Richter writes: “Frustration over the amount of money and public safety services being devoted to drug overdoses led to one Middletown City Council member asking if it...
Opinion: Can we see past our own cultural blind spots?

Michigan is set to become the 26th state to join the federal government in criminalizing female genital mutilation, even as two Detroit area doctors and one of their wives await trial for inflicting the procedure on a number of young girls. FGM, which is common in some parts of Africa and the Middle East, involves using a razor to remove all or part...
Is rural America the new inner city?

I’m sure you saw the big demographic news in our region recently, but in case you missed it: the population of the city of Dayton appears to have stabilized. After over a half-century of decline, Dayton is no longer losing people. This is huge for the city, and if the trend holds Dayton will join a number of other older industrial cities which...
More Stories