breaking news

Serious crash on I-75 South in Monroe causing major traffic delay

COMMENTARY: The feds who spied on King will spy on you, too

“This is about foreign terrorists on foreign soil. That’s what this is about.”

These were the words of House Speaker Paul Ryan on Thursday as he urged members to renew and increase unwarranted mass government surveillance powers, which the House did pass. Opponents of this legislation, Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act, believed it was illegal under the Fourth Amendment and would lead to increased government abuse of U.S. citizens.

Ryan wanted to assure everyone it wouldn’t lead to abuse, that only foreign terrorists would be spied on. But government officials always assure us their snooping will only be used on intended targets. They always say we can trust them, promise that boundaries won’t be overstepped, and that innocent people won’t be harmed.

And virtually every time they are wrong.

Government officials once said NSA surveillance in no way collected the private data of American citizens. Thanks to Edward Snowden, in 2013 we learned that the U.S. government was collecting everyone’s information en masse. Government promised the 2001 Patriot Act passed after 9/11 would only be used to target Islamic terrorists. Today, it is used more to fight the war on drugs and other criminal activities that have little to no connection to terrorism.

This is nothing new. In the mid-20th century, the NSA and FBI would spy without a warrant on suspected “domestic enemies” of the U.S.

Among those “enemies?” Martin Luther King, Jr.

Yes, there was a time when our government viewed King not as a champion of racial equality but the “most dangerous Negro of the future of this nation,” as the FBI called him. The FBI tracked King’s every move, believing he was part of a communist conspiracy.

When the state can categorize you as being part of a group it considers a threat, real or imagined, that’s all the justification government needs to ignore your constitutional rights. The NSA and FBI expanded the threat of communism to include King. Conservatives worryied about President Obama’s power to target political opponents, whether Tea Party activists or journalists. Today, many Americans worry about that same kind of power in the hands of President Trump.

They should worry. That King was once targeted is a stark reminder of the dangerous nature of unrestrained state power. But what about other innocent citizens less famous than King? What about Brandon Mayfield, the Oregon attorney who was surveilled without a warrant under the Patriot Act, falsely linked with terrorism and arrested and held without charge? What about Hooshang Amirahmadi, a Muslim-American Rutgers professor who was surveilled by the NSA due to his religious beliefs?

The type of government snooping used against King and so many others will again be part of the news cycle when the FISA Amendments Act passed by the House likely moves on to the Senate. Pro-privacy and Fourth Amendment advocate Senators Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) have vowed to filibuster if it does not contain due process reforms that would protect innocent parties (spoiler alert: it won’t).

But like Paul Ryan in the House, expect both Republican and Democrat leaders to assure the American people that the government would never undermine the Constitution and that they will only go after the bad guys.

The problem is — it is always the problem — who, exactly, will be included in the category of “bad guys?” One day, it could be me. It could be you.

Once upon a time, it was Martin Luther King, Jr., too.

Jack Hunter is politics editor of Rare.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Infrastructure spending won’t transform America

“MASON CITY. To get there you follow Highway 58, going northeast out of the city, and it is a good highway and new.” — Robert Penn Warren, “All the King’s Men” (1946) WASHINGTON — Appropriately, Warren began the best book about American populism, his novel based on Huey Long’s Louisiana career, with a...
OPINION: History-making or not engaging? Readers on Obama portraits
OPINION: History-making or not engaging? Readers on Obama portraits

IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER Paintings rarely stir up much controvery or heated discussion these days, so it was pretty interesting to hear the animated chatter that greeted Tuesday’s unveiling of the official portraits of former President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama that will hang in theSmithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery...
PERSPECTIVE: An Olympic reminder of parenting’s challenges

I don’t know about you, but I love the Olympics. Watching athletes perform after lifelong commitment is inspiring. Each of these amazing competitors has a story filled with years of preparation, hard work and unyielding perseverance. Most often, family support is paramount. I was watching an interview with Chloe Kim, the American gold medalist...
Gail Collins: Who’s President Trump’s worst minion?
Gail Collins: Who’s President Trump’s worst minion?

Does every terrible employee in America work for the Trump White House? O.K., probably not. Donald Trump didn’t hire the guy who told Hawaiians they were about to be hit by a ballistic missile. Or the airline representative who was accused of pressing a passenger to flush her hamster down the toilet. But for overall ineptitude and ability to...
Jackie Cushman: Consider how Washington and Lincoln shaped our country
Jackie Cushman: Consider how Washington and Lincoln shaped our country

This coming week, we recognize the federal holiday celebrating George Washington’s birthday. Many states now recognize President Abraham Lincoln’s birthday on the same day. For retail advertisers, it’s more about the sales than anything else, and for some school systems that had snow days earlier in the year, it’s a chance to...
More Stories