COMMENTARY: Thinking a bit outside the (cereal) box

I’m no nutritionist, but I do read labels and pay attention to prices. And on the surface, the sugar content of kids’ cereals is alarming, and the pricing ridiculous.

Consider a typical $4 box. A family with three growing kids could go through a box of cereal for breakfast. That’s $120 per month.

(Brief aside: If you conscientiously add juice with breakfast, please check the percentage of real juice on the back or side label; most of it is corn syrup, probably HFCS, with very little juice … probably 8 to 24 percent.)

The cereal industry has been repeatedly investigated and apparently everything’s legal, just maybe not moral. If conscientious parents have sticker-shock, the industry actually says we should use coupons. Really! Reportedly over half of cereal sold is “couponed.” But a “dollar off three” doesn’t help much, an 8.3 percent cost reduction in our example. It’s much more economical to buy generic or store brands. Whatever your opinion of generics, this would seem a benign case.

Cereal is grain. A box of cold cereal is grain that’s toasted, flaked, puffed, rolled, heavily sugared, or otherwise processed in huge quantities, weighed and put into plastic bags inside attractive colorful boxes. There’s probably not much more than a handful of grain in a box. And probably a handful of sugar or outright candy. And, rarely for kids, a few good things like raisins or almonds. But essentially grain and sugar.

A widely publicized study reported in Forbes tested 181 kids’ cereals and found many some 50 percent sugar by weight; only 10 met their standard for low sugar. They found cereals marketed to kids contained on average 40 percent more sugar than adult cereals, and that such kids start their day with more than half their recommended daily sugar.

Among the worst as tested: Honey Smacks and Golden Crisp. (Ironically, before a sugar backlash a few years ago, these were called, respectively, Sugar Smacks and Super Sugar Crisp … and the change was in name only.) WebMD also has the same test data. Recommendations from the study: Rice Crispies, Cheerios and Crispex (or generic or store brands of these).

Note also that the nutrition data required on the box, such as calories and sugar, are based on a serving size, which for many cereals is three-quarters of a cup. Did you ever give a growing boy three-quarters of a cup of cereal? Even the testers use the term “bowl,” meaning 1 1/2 cups, or twice the quoted serving size.

There’s absolutely no reason to pay high prices for sugar in a cereal box, especially considering our sugar surplus and governmental sugar subsidies. Even if we don’t value your children’s health, or concern ourselves with rampant child obesity and its devastating psychological and medical problems, at least let’s have concern for our pocketbooks. (BTW, what’s a “pocketbook”?)

I was also disappointed to see the Little League World Series sponsored, not by nutritional Kellogg’s Cereals, but by “Kellogg’s Sugar Frosted Flakes.” Some kind of choice — allowing for hundreds of sugar-filled commercials during the long playoffs, and lots of young T-Ballers and Little Leaguers clamoring for Tony the Tiger, “They’re Grrrrrreat!” Maybe not.

David Shumway is one of our regular community contributors.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: The content of the GOP’s character

Even those who have long since accepted the premise that Donald Trump is corrupt, self-centered and dishonest seem a bit shocked by his tirades over the Presidents Day weekend. Using the Parkland, Florida, massacre as an excuse to attack the FBI for investigating Russian election intervention on his behalf — while lying about his own past denials...
Opinion: Is Trump guilty, or does he just look guilty?

When absorbing news about the Mueller investigation, I can’t help thinking of Saddam Hussein. No, I’m not equating our president with the late Iraqi dictator. I’m thinking more about our assumptions regarding Saddam’s guilt. In the run-up to the Iraq War, the whole world was asking whether Saddam had a secret program for weapons...
Opinion: GOP tax reform used to be unpopular. Not anymore.

WASHINGTON — When the Republican-controlled Congress first approved its tax bill in December, most Democrats believed it would be a political loser for the GOP. Indeed, a New York Times poll found that just 37 percent of Americans approved of the plan. “To pass a bill of tax cuts and have it be so unpopular with the American people is an...
Opinion: Everybody’s better than you-know-who

Perhaps you read this week that Donald Trump has replaced James Buchanan as the worst president in the history of the United States. This was in a survey of experts in presidential politics — people who have an opinion about whether Chester A. Arthur was better than Martin Van Buren. Trump came in last, with a score of 12 out of 100. Perhaps...
Opinion: Gun control about saving lives, not waging culture wars

WASHINGTON — You have perhaps heard the joke about the liberal who is so open-minded that he can’t even take his own side in an argument. What’s less funny is that on gun control, liberals have been told for years that if they do take their own side in the argument, they will only hurt their cause. Supporters of even modest restrictions...
More Stories