breaking news

Meet the 2017 winners of’s Best of Dayton poll

OPINION: Here’s your chance to rate Trump’s first year

As is customary, many commentators have offered assessments of President Trump’s first year in office. These appraisals have varied, and I encourage you to Google and review several for yourself. Most of these evaluations have been offered by political elites, but since Trump’s appeal is a populist one, it’s important that average voters make their own assessments of his first year, and I invite you to do just that.

These are the rules of participation. First, your appraisal must employ at least one of the assessment tools discussed below. Second, your review should be 250 words or less; and third, you agree that I may use all, or parts, of your review (including your name) in a future column. Appraisals, along with your contact information, should be emailed to no later than two weeks from today’s publication. To guide your efforts, below are three analytical perspectives employed by scholars to determine presidential effectiveness.

Recall that our system of separation of powers was designed to make it difficult for any one branch to do much on its own. Therefore, to achieve their policy goals, presidents must carefully navigate our Constitutional system of fragmented power. In my beginning American Government course, students are introduced to ways that scholars try to objectively evaluate how well presidents are able to move their agendas. What I refer to as “the debate between the two Richards” is a helpful starting point.

In his classic book, “Presidential Power,” Richard Neustadt argued that a president’s sole power is that of persuasion. Translating campaign promises into policy achievements requires presidents to get Congress, bureaucrats, interest groups, courts, and/or the public, to go along with them. Neustadt also notes that persuasion is strengthened with a clear electoral victory, and the larger the vote margin, the more persuasive a president can expect to be.

More successful presidents also bring the nation together with inspiring rhetoric and action. How well has President Trump used the power of persuasion?

On the other hand, scholar Richard Nathan has argued that besides persuasion, presidents have other tools that can be used to advance their agendas, including the powers of executive appointments and executive orders. How do you think the president has wielded these tools? To aid your analysis, here are two nonpartisan sources of data. Appointments: Executive orders:

Finally, noted journalist Headrick Smith has argued that successful presidents are those who: a) keep their agendas focused and simple, rather than sprawling; b) are able to build coalitions among opposing interests, while keeping their base of support intact; and c) are able to create and maintain a positive public image. How would you rate Trump on these three aspects of effective leadership?

Are you thinking like a political scientist now? I look forward to reading your reviews, and including some of your opinions from across the spectrum in a future column.

Rob Baker, Ph.D., teaches political science at Wittenberg University and is a regular contributor.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

COMMENTARY: Want to see grit in action? Meet our immigrants

He’s one of the finest surgeons in Dayton (I won’t embarrass him by using his name) and patients are referred to him from all over our region. And he came to the Miami Valley as a refugee from a war-torn nation in West Africa. You know, one of those places Donald Trump insulted with a term this newspaper won’t print. Trump’s...
OPINION: Let’s not use euphemisms for conduct unbecoming a president

Now that Donald Trump has been president for almost a year, it’s time the media call his behavior what it is rather than try to normalize it. Here are the six most misleading media euphemisms for conduct unbecoming a president. 1. Calling Trump’s tweets “presidential “statements” or “press releases.” Wrong...
OPINION: Trump becomes Bill the Butcher, and Democrats feel the thrill

Could a nativist villain like Bill the Butcher from “Gangs of New York” be used to silence dissent in the all-important debate over national sovereignty and Americans controlling their own borders? Yes, it could happen. In fact it happened the other day, when the president of the United States became Bill the Butcher. President Donald Trump...
Opinion: Trump, meet a hero whom you maligned

In 1885, a poor, uneducated 16-year-old boy arrived in our country from Germany at a time when immigrants were often looked down on by affluent Americans. This boy was ambitious and entrepreneurial, and, despite language problems, he earned some money and then traveled up to the Klondike during the gold rush to operate a hotel that became notorious...
Opinion: Republicans must lead in upcoming abortion debate

This year, as every year, I will be joining the hundreds of thousands who will be arriving in Washington, D.C., for the March for Life, noting the anniversary of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which legalized abortion on demand in our country. The event has taken place every year since 1973 and will continue to take place every year until this disastrous...
More Stories