COMMENTARY: Why are these other countries so happy?

Recently read in both National Geographic and online Time about the world’s happiest countries: Costa Rica, Denmark and Singapore.

BTW, the United States falls somewhere in the middle.

I looked into the criteria used by this Gallup World Poll “world happiness report.” Questions were asked about life as a whole, daily happiness, and well-being. What makes people happy, they found, derives from strong economies, healthy life expectancy, social relationships, generosity, trust and freedom.

We visited Costa Rica and loved the country and its people. It’s true! We were impressed by their genuine sense of contentment. They even have a name for it: “Pura vida,” literally “pure life.” Beyond a simple translation, it expresses the idea of simply enjoying life and being happy.

But what’s common among these three seemingly disparate societies? In all cases, many needs over which we stress are minimized: It’s no secret that uncertainty and concerns for the future are primary drivers of stress. People in these three countries can enjoy today because they are not overly worried about tomorrow. Cradle-to-grave medical care, and senior citizen needs from independent living through nursing care, are provided. Schooling is also “free.”

PERSPECTIVE: The magic of Thanksgiving togetherness

Free? Yes, these countries all pay high income taxes, but I estimated that if I added my payroll taxes for Medicare and Social Security, medical insurance and out-of-pocket costs, school tax levies and college education costs to my income taxes, I’d be paying about as much.

Also, they don’t have a great gap between the very rich and the working poor. There are no oligarchs who control the wealth at the expense of the citizenry, as in many (much unhappier) countries. In each case, well-established national policies perpetuate an environment conducive to happiness, and elected officials maintain that environment without disruptive changes by political parties.

Unfortunately our political culture is not similarly inclined. We are too driven by political egos, winners/losers, lobbyism, special interests, industry groups and personal financial gain to even consider looking at what would make us collectively content and happy.

COMMENTARY: Cutting off the Clean Power Plan will just hurt us all

Another thing they have in common, and which distinguishes them from the U.S., is that they’re relatively homogeneous societies. There’s a singular societal norm to which the vast majority subscribes. The U.S. has always been a diverse nation; our cultures have never really blended. So the aspirations, and norms of the African-American, Native American, Chinese, European-American Jewish, Italian immigrant, etc. etc. communities differ. We’re also much bigger than all of these three happy countries put together; there are geographic differences in what makes us content.

We also have a massive military to fund, whereas these three countries have very small or non-existent militaries. Of course, as free-world leader and defender, we need to have the world’s best … but just for fun consider what could be done societally if that money was spent on the aforementioned contributors to happiness.

So yes, legislation and legislators could improve our happiness score and significantly reduce our national stress to a productive level. But even if they wanted to it would be difficult for such a complicated diverse nation with the world’s finest military. Still, it’s fun to think about.

David Shumway is one of our regular community contributors.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: The real Down syndrome ‘problem’

Iceland must be pleased that it is close to success in its program of genocide, but before congratulating that nation on its final solution to the Down syndrome problem, perhaps it might answer a question: What is this problem? To help understand why some people might ask this question, keep in mind two children while reading today’s column....
Opinion: In defense of cultural appropriation

I’m here to defend cultural appropriation. “Cross-cultural influence,” would be the less pejorative phrase. But the term above, with its connotations of grand-theft culture, is the one favored by some African-American activists who’ve had it up to here with nonblack performers borrowing the soul and style of Michael, Marvin...
Here’s what you said about the student walkout
Here’s what you said about the student walkout

Matt Klontz: They should all be punished … detention or suspension. They have a right to protest but they should have done that before or after school. They have no Constitutional “right” to disrupt class time and the school day. Matt Atha: It’s the same thing as teachers that went on strike years ago for better wages. They...
Opinion: Want to dive in the Trump job pool? Ask me anything

Dear Career Counsel, My grandson just graduated from college and is having a terrible time finding work. I was wondering if he would qualify for a job with the White House. I hear there’s lots of turnover. Is secretary of state still available? Or what about the young man who carried around extra pens for the president? Didn’t he just get...
Opinion: Tillerson’s insubordination meant he had to go

WASHINGTON — There are many reasons Rex Tillerson’s tenure as secretary of state was a failure, from his notorious isolation from his subordinates to his failure to help quickly staff the political appointment positions at State with competent Republicans. But it was his insubordination to the president that assured that he wouldn&rsquo...
More Stories