breaking news

SUV hits buggy: Woman killed, husband, 2 infants critical; driver jailed in Shelby Co.

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: Readers on literacy, the pope and the Crew


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Literacy affects health care, too

This is in response to Shari Cooper’s “More medical accommodations, please,” Sept. 26. Aside from physical disabilities, even otherwise able-bodied individuals may have literacy barriers such as reading and following medical instruction. Here is some additional food for thought and helpful hints to traverse the health care chasm between what your health care professional wants you to do and how you can effectively accommodate those wishes.

First, the office person doing the cursory medical intake on the patient needs to inquire, “How best do you deal with medical forms and instructions in self-care, by reading or having it read to you?” Another diplomatically posed query might be, “How often do you have problems learning about your medical condition or ability to take medications because of difficulty understanding written information?”

In my Public Health education at Kent State University’s College of Public Health and in practice, I advocate assessing an individual’s “health literacy” or ability to comprehend and follow healthcare instruction by using the free The Newest Vital Sign (Pfizer Labs) questionnaire, which uses an ice-cream carton nutrition label to ask six basic questions about the label’s per serving information. An individual’s ability to answer at least 50 percent or more of the six questions usually suggests adequate health literacy. Those responding at less than 50 percent may need help with maneuvering health care instructions and self-care. To wit: if the patient cannot read and comprehend basic information on an ice cream nutrition label, chances are he may be at risk for low health literacy. JERRY A. O’RYAN, SPRING VALLEY

The Pope vs. the President

Pope Francis says that if President Trump is a good pro-lifer, he should understand that the “family” is the cradle of life and you must defend its “unity,” i.e. maintain the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Why is the Pope so eager to scold Trump about DACA and associate it with “family” and “pro-life”?

If the Pope truly believes the “family” is the cradle of life and that its unity needs to be defended, he would be a lot more concerned that over 50 percent of U.S. marriages end in divorce (over 20 percentof Catholic marriages) and only 46 percentof U.S. children under 18 live in households headed by two heterosexual parents in their first marriage. These statistics represent a lot bigger challenge to “family” and “unity” than maintaining DACA. In fact, the Pope seems to lean toward being more accepting and accommodating of non-traditional families.

It seems pretty obvious that the Pope is a liberal progressive and is much more focused on his dislike of Trump than he is focused on “family” and defending family “unity.” JOSEPH BRAFFORD, BEAVERCREEK

FROM OUR FACEBOOK PAGES

On the story about the Columbus Crew soccer team considering a move to Austin:

Roger Schaub: They were the first team to build a soccer-specific stadium. Half the teams I ref are sponsored by the Crew. They couldn’t. Best fan base in the country.

Craig Turner: Why should taxpayers build a no public company a stadium? That is NOT the public’s responsibility. Go ahead, leave.

Rob May: The owner doesn’t intend to move them, but is using it as a bargaining chip in getting a new stadium.

Scott Rairden: From what I’ve read, he only bought the team to move them, so a new stadium deal is simply an excuse. As a soccer fan in the area, it sucks.

Marty Jones: Sounds like the browns in the ’90s all over again.

Kevin Barlow: Money talks.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: ‘Little Pink House’ speaks truth to power

Coming soon to a cinema near you — you can make this happen; read on — is a bite-your-nails true-story thriller featuring heroes, villains and a history-making struggle over … the Constitution’s Takings Clause. Next Feb. 24, “Little Pink House” will win the Oscar for best picture if Hollywood’s political preening...
Opinion: What happened in Starbucks isn’t really about Starbucks

I don’t drink coffee, so I can’t boycott Starbucks. But I wouldn’t if I could. Yes, I understand — and share — the national anger over viral video of last week’s arrest of two African-American men at one of the company’s Philadelphia stores. The men, who have yet to be identified, were reportedly doing nothing...
Opinion: Trump’s Syria strike was meant to project strength

WASHINGTON — In 2013, after Syrian dictator Bashar Assad crossed President Obama’s red line and used chemical weapons on innocent civilians, a U.S. official told the Los Angeles Times that Obama’s retaliatory strike would likely be “just muscular enough not to get mocked” but not so devastating that it would elicit a response...
Opinion: Our gold-leaf presidency

Let’s talk for a minute about Mar-a-Lago. Donald Trump was there this week, hosting a get-together with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan. Important stuff to be discussed — North Korea, trade. The two men held a brief press conference on Tuesday, at which the president revealed: “Many of the world’s great leaders request to...
Opinion: Trump — prisoner of the War Party?

“Ten days ago, President Trump was saying ‘the United States should withdraw from Syria.’ We convinced him it was necessary to stay.” Thus boasted French President Emmanuel Macron Saturday, adding, “We convinced him it was necessary to stay for the long term.” Is the U.S. indeed in the Syrian civil war “for...
More Stories