After talk of removal, Centerville retains cross country coach

Opinion: Adoption bill seeks to enshrine faith-based discrimination

Here’s a prayer that the Catholic version of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” reveals itself to the Kansas legislature.

State lawmakers are currently considering the Adoption Protection Act, which would ensure that faith-based child placement agencies may gain state contracts even if they deny otherwise qualified adoptive parents to a placement that would violate that agency’s “sincerely held religious beliefs.”

In other words, agencies that use taxpayer dollars could refuse to place kids with LGBT parents.

The measure is backed by the Kansas Catholic Conference, representing the state’s bishops.

Catholics who oppose this kind of overt discrimination need to rise up and show themselves. They are plentiful, and their voices are needed to defeat a bill seeking to use the faith as an anti-gay stronghold.

Backers of are correct to point out that Catholic doctrine discusses homosexuality as an “an intrinsic moral evil” and that similar legislation elsewhere is supported by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.

The truth, however, is that Catholics, far more than many other faiths and certainly the general population, are generally more supportive of LGBT people’s right to marry, to raise children and to adopt. Multiple surveys of public opinion bear this out.

There’s a reason so many Catholics rejoiced in 2013when Pope Francis said, “If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?”

It’s entirely fair for a religious organization to conduct its affairs in accordance with its own moral values. It is not fair to ask taxpayers to subsidize behavior that run counter to the public interest and violate the rights of certain members of society on the basis of religious morals.

It’s important to point out that the adoption services of Catholic Charities in the southwest portion of Kansas reports that it uses fees and donations, not state funds, to manage its adoptions. Fair enough. But then why do Kansas’ Catholic bishops believe we need this unnecessary and potentially discriminatory remedy to a non-issue?

The claim is that faith-based agencies need this protection to set up shop in Kansas. It’s based on a Virginia law.

But why do we need new agencies to set up shop? A curious legislator’s efforts to find out exactly which faith-based organizations are eager to set up adoption services in the state have gone unanswered.

Moreover, as adoption advocates stress, it’s not that there aren’t enough adoption agencies in Kansas. It’s that there aren’t enough families willing to adopt.

Less than a quarter of children needing adoptive homes in America find their “forever families” each year. In Kansas, the rolls are bursting with increasing numbers of children in state care, more than 7,500 at last count.

Reducing the pool of potential adoptive parents by excluding gay and lesbian people from publicly funded adoptions won’t solve the lack of homes.

As society’s understanding and acceptance grows around issues of sexual orientation, religious-based groups will have to choose either to shift their policies or expect to forgo state funding.

What if the issue was an interracial couple that was denied an adoption by a religious group because a leader found a biblical passage that seemed to imply this was God’s will?

God often works in mysterious ways. This gambit by Kansas’ bishops may end up challenging Catholic minds, hearts and spirits in ways they didn’t anticipate. We can only hope.

Writes for Tribune Content Agency.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: From Russia with love

Robert Mueller’s investigation into whether President Donald Trump and the Russians colluded to rig the 2016 presidential election so far has borne little fruit. The Democrats and their media allies would love to find some Russian collusion and interference. I can help them discover some, but I doubt that they will show much interest. Here it...
Opinion: When Harry marries Meghan, a most uncommon commoner

Marrying up. That’s what we usually say about a commoner who marries into a royal family. But by marrying Meghan Markle, you might say that Prince Henry of Wales — better known to most of us as Prince Harry — is marrying up too. After all, Markle, 36, is more than just a pretty face. Before the Northwestern University theater graduate...
Opinion: One family’s hell at the hands of an abusive justice system

The words that Rosie McIntyre chooses to describe what occurred in the police detective’s office are as searing as the allegation. “I felt like I was a n——r slave,” she said through tears. For a black woman, there’s hardly anything more degrading, she went on, explaining through wavering emotions. The feeling was...
Opinion: The fall of the German empire

The first modern German empire was announced by Otto von Bismarck at Versailles in 1871; it died on the Western Front in 1918. The second German empire was forged in a swift march of annexations and blitzkriegs; it lasted seven terrible years, from the Anschluss to the bunker, and died with Hitler and his cult. The third German empire is a different...
Opinion: Trump breaks bread, glasses and party at lunch

POTUS coming to Tuesday lunch. Translated, the president of the United States is joining 50 Republican senators in the Capitol to crash their private Tuesday lunch. Nobody is glad to hear this on the Senate side. We love the constitutional separation of powers. The Senate is the last citadel of democracy, they say. We in the press are free as birds...
More Stories