Opinion: Adoption bill seeks to enshrine faith-based discrimination

Here’s a prayer that the Catholic version of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” reveals itself to the Kansas legislature.

State lawmakers are currently considering the Adoption Protection Act, which would ensure that faith-based child placement agencies may gain state contracts even if they deny otherwise qualified adoptive parents to a placement that would violate that agency’s “sincerely held religious beliefs.”

In other words, agencies that use taxpayer dollars could refuse to place kids with LGBT parents.

The measure is backed by the Kansas Catholic Conference, representing the state’s bishops.

Catholics who oppose this kind of overt discrimination need to rise up and show themselves. They are plentiful, and their voices are needed to defeat a bill seeking to use the faith as an anti-gay stronghold.

Backers of are correct to point out that Catholic doctrine discusses homosexuality as an “an intrinsic moral evil” and that similar legislation elsewhere is supported by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.

The truth, however, is that Catholics, far more than many other faiths and certainly the general population, are generally more supportive of LGBT people’s right to marry, to raise children and to adopt. Multiple surveys of public opinion bear this out.

There’s a reason so many Catholics rejoiced in 2013when Pope Francis said, “If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?”

It’s entirely fair for a religious organization to conduct its affairs in accordance with its own moral values. It is not fair to ask taxpayers to subsidize behavior that run counter to the public interest and violate the rights of certain members of society on the basis of religious morals.

It’s important to point out that the adoption services of Catholic Charities in the southwest portion of Kansas reports that it uses fees and donations, not state funds, to manage its adoptions. Fair enough. But then why do Kansas’ Catholic bishops believe we need this unnecessary and potentially discriminatory remedy to a non-issue?

The claim is that faith-based agencies need this protection to set up shop in Kansas. It’s based on a Virginia law.

But why do we need new agencies to set up shop? A curious legislator’s efforts to find out exactly which faith-based organizations are eager to set up adoption services in the state have gone unanswered.

Moreover, as adoption advocates stress, it’s not that there aren’t enough adoption agencies in Kansas. It’s that there aren’t enough families willing to adopt.

Less than a quarter of children needing adoptive homes in America find their “forever families” each year. In Kansas, the rolls are bursting with increasing numbers of children in state care, more than 7,500 at last count.

Reducing the pool of potential adoptive parents by excluding gay and lesbian people from publicly funded adoptions won’t solve the lack of homes.

As society’s understanding and acceptance grows around issues of sexual orientation, religious-based groups will have to choose either to shift their policies or expect to forgo state funding.

What if the issue was an interracial couple that was denied an adoption by a religious group because a leader found a biblical passage that seemed to imply this was God’s will?

God often works in mysterious ways. This gambit by Kansas’ bishops may end up challenging Catholic minds, hearts and spirits in ways they didn’t anticipate. We can only hope.

Writes for Tribune Content Agency.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Kansas governor’s race might be a test for Trumpism

Recent days have me wondering what Kansas’ fifth governor — James Madison Harvey — would say about the pickle the state find itself in now. Harvey, a Republican, is my relative by marriage. He married Charlotte Cutter, whose sister is my great grandmother. To the inevitable reader who will doubt that someone with the last name of...
Opinion: The White Strategy

In the aftermath of the 2012 election, when just about everyone assumed Mitt Romney lost because he didn’t win enough Hispanic votes, election analyst Sean Trende produced a dissenting take. A close look at the results across the Midwest and Appalachia revealed a large population of what Trende called “missing white voters” &mdash...
Opinion: Partying like it’s 1998

And now for something completely similar. For a while, those of us who devoted a lot of time to understanding the Asian financial crisis two decades ago were wondering whether Turkey was going to stage a re-enactment. Sure enough, that’s what seems to be happening. Here’s the script: start with a country that, for whatever reason, became...
Opinion: A great moment in black history

In 2006, Leonard Pitts wrote this column based on an interview with Ron Stallworth, who, 12 years later, is the subject of Spike Lee’s latest film, “BlacKkKlansman.” In 1979, Stallworth was an intelligence officer with the Colorado Springs police department. He infiltrated the Ku Klux Klan, a hate group, and even developed a relationship...
Opinion: Markets know better than bureaucrats what society needs

Governments, seemingly eager to supply their critics with ammunition, constantly validate historian Robert Conquest: The behavior of any bureaucratic organization can best be understood by assuming that it is controlled by a secret cabal of its enemies. Consider North Carolina’s intervention in the medical-devices market. Born in India, Dr. Gajendra...
More Stories