Opinion: Adoption bill seeks to enshrine faith-based discrimination

Here’s a prayer that the Catholic version of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” reveals itself to the Kansas legislature.

State lawmakers are currently considering the Adoption Protection Act, which would ensure that faith-based child placement agencies may gain state contracts even if they deny otherwise qualified adoptive parents to a placement that would violate that agency’s “sincerely held religious beliefs.”

In other words, agencies that use taxpayer dollars could refuse to place kids with LGBT parents.

The measure is backed by the Kansas Catholic Conference, representing the state’s bishops.

Catholics who oppose this kind of overt discrimination need to rise up and show themselves. They are plentiful, and their voices are needed to defeat a bill seeking to use the faith as an anti-gay stronghold.

Backers of are correct to point out that Catholic doctrine discusses homosexuality as an “an intrinsic moral evil” and that similar legislation elsewhere is supported by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.

The truth, however, is that Catholics, far more than many other faiths and certainly the general population, are generally more supportive of LGBT people’s right to marry, to raise children and to adopt. Multiple surveys of public opinion bear this out.

There’s a reason so many Catholics rejoiced in 2013when Pope Francis said, “If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?”

It’s entirely fair for a religious organization to conduct its affairs in accordance with its own moral values. It is not fair to ask taxpayers to subsidize behavior that run counter to the public interest and violate the rights of certain members of society on the basis of religious morals.

It’s important to point out that the adoption services of Catholic Charities in the southwest portion of Kansas reports that it uses fees and donations, not state funds, to manage its adoptions. Fair enough. But then why do Kansas’ Catholic bishops believe we need this unnecessary and potentially discriminatory remedy to a non-issue?

The claim is that faith-based agencies need this protection to set up shop in Kansas. It’s based on a Virginia law.

But why do we need new agencies to set up shop? A curious legislator’s efforts to find out exactly which faith-based organizations are eager to set up adoption services in the state have gone unanswered.

Moreover, as adoption advocates stress, it’s not that there aren’t enough adoption agencies in Kansas. It’s that there aren’t enough families willing to adopt.

Less than a quarter of children needing adoptive homes in America find their “forever families” each year. In Kansas, the rolls are bursting with increasing numbers of children in state care, more than 7,500 at last count.

Reducing the pool of potential adoptive parents by excluding gay and lesbian people from publicly funded adoptions won’t solve the lack of homes.

As society’s understanding and acceptance grows around issues of sexual orientation, religious-based groups will have to choose either to shift their policies or expect to forgo state funding.

What if the issue was an interracial couple that was denied an adoption by a religious group because a leader found a biblical passage that seemed to imply this was God’s will?

God often works in mysterious ways. This gambit by Kansas’ bishops may end up challenging Catholic minds, hearts and spirits in ways they didn’t anticipate. We can only hope.

Writes for Tribune Content Agency.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Victims of sexual assault stand tall in a Kansas courtroom

From where they sat in the courtroom, the predator’s victims — two past girlfriends, one perfect stranger and a woman who once lived in the same apartment complex — couldn’t see the handcuffs clamping Brady Newman-Caddell’s wrists. He kept his hands in his lap during the sentencing hearing this week in Olathe, Kan. Except...
Opinion: The Trump tax scam, Phase II

When the Trump tax cut was on the verge of being enacted, I called it “the biggest tax scam in history,” and made a prediction: Deficits would soar, and when they did, Republicans would once again pretend to care about debt and demand cuts in Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. Sure enough, the deficit is soaring. And this week Mitch...
Opinion: Warren highlights the danger of racial identity

She was mocked as “Fauxcahontas” long before President Donald Trump began referring to her as “Pocahontas,” and frankly, Sen. Elizabeth Warren invited the ridicule. She is a poster child for the pitfalls of basing identity on race, and reminds us of the many furies such self-definition can unleash. What people choose to call...
Opinion: Young people, the GOP is scared of you

A word for young people, people of color and, in particular, young people of color: The Republicans are scared of you. Maybe you find that hard to believe. Maybe you wonder how the party can be scared of you — or of anybody — given that it controls all three branches of the federal government and most of the nation’s state houses...
Opinion: Democrats’ smear of Kavanaugh sunk their own Senate chances

WASHINGTON — Just a few weeks ago, analysts thought that control of the U.S. Senate was in play this November and that momentum was shifting to the Democrats. Thanks to their brutal campaign of character assassination against now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh, those chances appear to be slipping away. Case in point is Tennessee, where Republican Rep...
More Stories