breaking news

UD police successfully push rowdy students back indoors after revelers threw bottles, rocks at them

OPINION: Here’s your chance to rate Trump’s first year

As is customary, many commentators have offered assessments of President Trump’s first year in office. These appraisals have varied, and I encourage you to Google and review several for yourself. Most of these evaluations have been offered by political elites, but since Trump’s appeal is a populist one, it’s important that average voters make their own assessments of his first year, and I invite you to do just that.

These are the rules of participation. First, your appraisal must employ at least one of the assessment tools discussed below. Second, your review should be 250 words or less; and third, you agree that I may use all, or parts, of your review (including your name) in a future column. Appraisals, along with your contact information, should be emailed to no later than two weeks from today’s publication. To guide your efforts, below are three analytical perspectives employed by scholars to determine presidential effectiveness.

Recall that our system of separation of powers was designed to make it difficult for any one branch to do much on its own. Therefore, to achieve their policy goals, presidents must carefully navigate our Constitutional system of fragmented power. In my beginning American Government course, students are introduced to ways that scholars try to objectively evaluate how well presidents are able to move their agendas. What I refer to as “the debate between the two Richards” is a helpful starting point.

In his classic book, “Presidential Power,” Richard Neustadt argued that a president’s sole power is that of persuasion. Translating campaign promises into policy achievements requires presidents to get Congress, bureaucrats, interest groups, courts, and/or the public, to go along with them. Neustadt also notes that persuasion is strengthened with a clear electoral victory, and the larger the vote margin, the more persuasive a president can expect to be.

More successful presidents also bring the nation together with inspiring rhetoric and action. How well has President Trump used the power of persuasion?

On the other hand, scholar Richard Nathan has argued that besides persuasion, presidents have other tools that can be used to advance their agendas, including the powers of executive appointments and executive orders. How do you think the president has wielded these tools? To aid your analysis, here are two nonpartisan sources of data. Appointments: Executive orders:

Finally, noted journalist Headrick Smith has argued that successful presidents are those who: a) keep their agendas focused and simple, rather than sprawling; b) are able to build coalitions among opposing interests, while keeping their base of support intact; and c) are able to create and maintain a positive public image. How would you rate Trump on these three aspects of effective leadership?

Are you thinking like a political scientist now? I look forward to reading your reviews, and including some of your opinions from across the spectrum in a future column.

Rob Baker, Ph.D., teaches political science at Wittenberg University and is a regular contributor.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: The real Down syndrome ‘problem’

Iceland must be pleased that it is close to success in its program of genocide, but before congratulating that nation on its final solution to the Down syndrome problem, perhaps it might answer a question: What is this problem? To help understand why some people might ask this question, keep in mind two children while reading today’s column....
Opinion: In defense of cultural appropriation

I’m here to defend cultural appropriation. “Cross-cultural influence,” would be the less pejorative phrase. But the term above, with its connotations of grand-theft culture, is the one favored by some African-American activists who’ve had it up to here with nonblack performers borrowing the soul and style of Michael, Marvin...
Here’s what you said about the student walkout
Here’s what you said about the student walkout

Matt Klontz: They should all be punished … detention or suspension. They have a right to protest but they should have done that before or after school. They have no Constitutional “right” to disrupt class time and the school day. Matt Atha: It’s the same thing as teachers that went on strike years ago for better wages. They...
Opinion: Want to dive in the Trump job pool? Ask me anything

Dear Career Counsel, My grandson just graduated from college and is having a terrible time finding work. I was wondering if he would qualify for a job with the White House. I hear there’s lots of turnover. Is secretary of state still available? Or what about the young man who carried around extra pens for the president? Didn’t he just get...
Opinion: Tillerson’s insubordination meant he had to go

WASHINGTON — There are many reasons Rex Tillerson’s tenure as secretary of state was a failure, from his notorious isolation from his subordinates to his failure to help quickly staff the political appointment positions at State with competent Republicans. But it was his insubordination to the president that assured that he wouldn&rsquo...
More Stories