Trump support wavering in farm country over ethanol, trade moves

“There was strong support for the president,” one observer said. “There continues to be strong support for the president. However, some of that support is wavering because of the trade issue and ethanol.”


Even as Donald Trump tweets his support for U.S. agriculture, farmer loyalty for the president looks like it's starting to waver over moves that may undermine corn-based ethanol and escalate trade disputes with countries that import American crops. 

A long-anticipated White House announcement expected to lower costs for oil refiners at the expense of ethanol may show that the Environmental Protection Agency is breaking promises to protect the biofuel, according to the National Biodiesel Board. Meanwhile, trade actions also are raising concerns among farmers, said Jon Doggett, executive vice president of the National Corn Growers Association. 

"There was strong support for the president," Doggett said. "There continues to be strong support for the president. However, some of that support is wavering because of the trade issue and ethanol." 

Farmers nationwide rallied behind Trump during his 2016 presidential campaign, forming part of the rural-voter bedrock that put him in the White House. Still, administration actions including renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement and protecting the U.S. steel industry have shown an emphasis on Rust Belt versus Farm Belt voters, exposing potential fissures in his small-town base. 

Trump on Monday tweeted his support for agriculture, saying farmers "have not been doing well for 15 years," and vowing "massive trade deficits no longer." The industry is one of the few sectors of the U.S. economy that maintains a trade surplus, and while the government forecasts a 5.1 percent drop in farmer profits this year, the past decade saw several years of record incomes. 

Agriculture groups have repeatedly urged caution on trade disputes, citing the importance of the Mexican and Canadian export markets under NAFTA. They've also pointed to China's willingness to retaliate against U.S. measures by targeting major commodities including soybeans, the second-most-valuable American crop. 

Biofuels policy, meanwhile, has become a flashpoint in a long-simmering refiners-versus-farmers standoff. 

Farm-state lawmakers including Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley have been in a series of negotiations with Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, industry stakeholders and the White House as refiners have sought waivers of biofuels rules. Some waivers have been granted by the EPA. Grassley, who represents the top ethanol-producing state, has threatened to seek EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt's resignation if the agency undermines renewable fuel requirements. 

While most farmers still support the president, frustration with his administration has come more into the open. 

More than 80 percent of voters in Iowa, Minnesota and Missouri said it was important that Trump maintain his promise to defend federal biofuel mandates, according to a survey by the National Biodiesel Board. A "substantial majority" of respondents say the EPA's Pruitt isn't reflecting the president's promises, the Jefferson City, Missouri-based board said. 

The controversy is reverberating in politically important agricultural states, several of which host Senate races that may determine which party controls the chamber this year. Two incumbent Democrats in Minnesota and one in Missouri, both states covered by the survey, are up for re-election. Incumbent Democrats are also facing tough battles in North Dakota and Indiana, which also produce biofuels. 

The likelihood of a massive exodus of farmers from the Trump coalition is low, said Harwood Schaffer, an agricultural economist and farm-policy expert at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville. Without a truly dramatic reshaping of the Renewable Fuels Standard, one which would radically lower corn demand and crop prices across the board, farmers are likely to stick with Trump for cultural reasons, he said. 

But even weakening support, combined with skepticism from voters who may not be farmers but still care about agricultural issues, may be enough to tilt outcomes in several close races this year, Schaffer said. The farm bloc may be pro-Trump, but also may be less in the president's pocket than was earlier assumed, he said. 

"If you see some changes on the margins, you might see some softening along the edges," in terms of support, Schaffer said. "If you see changes that make the price of corn go from $4 to $2 (a bushel), then you'll have a rebellion."


Reader Comments


Next Up in Politics

Gov. Kasich thinking about job in media, what’s next
Gov. Kasich thinking about job in media, what’s next

Departing Ohio Gov. John Kasich seemingly wants it both ways. The President Donald Trump-bashing Republican, long in demand on TV political talk shows, thinks it “likely” he will end up in the news media, hopefully in some “unique” role on television. But at the same time, the last candidate standing in the way of Trump in the...
Ohio Senate set to vote on ‘heartbeat’ abortion bill tomorrow
Ohio Senate set to vote on ‘heartbeat’ abortion bill tomorrow

Action on the so-called “heartbeat” abortion ban bill stalled again in the Ohio Senate but may come as soon as tomorrow. Senate Health Committee is expected to reconvene later today or tomorrow morning to consider amendments to House Bill 258, which would prohibit abortions once a fetal heartbeat can be detected — sometimes as early...
College students: Want to work in Washington, D.C. for a summer?
College students: Want to work in Washington, D.C. for a summer?

U.S. Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, is accepting applications for internship opportunities in his Washington, D.C. and state offices. Portman said he began his career in public service as a congressional intern and knows the benefits of offering college students an “exciting introduction to Congress and the workings of a Senate office,” said...
What do you think of Ohio making it harder to put issues on the ballot?
What do you think of Ohio making it harder to put issues on the ballot?

If you’re an elitist, Ohio House Joint Resolution 19 should be your cup of tea. HJR 19, backed by the Ohio General Assembly’s Republican leaders, would make it harder for rank-and-file Ohioans to amend the state constitution. The way things are now, Ohio voters may propose an amendment to the state constitution by gathering signatures on...
Kettering set to vote on 2019 personnel raises and changes
Kettering set to vote on 2019 personnel raises and changes

Kettering will vote on Tuesday on changes in pay grades and restructuring of positions for city employees for 2019. If approved, the move would add raises for non-union and part-time employees, boost police and fire staffing and make changes to the the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Arts Department. Council members last week held a first reading of...
More Stories