McCoy: Do recent last-place Reds squads compare to 101-loss 1982 team?

Sept 07, 2018
  • By Hal McCoy
  • Contributing Writer

Hall of Fame baseball writer Hal McCoy knows a thing or two about our nation’s pastime. Tap into that knowledge by sending an email to halmccoy1@hotmail.com.

Q: Did you see where one of your favorite people recently served a one-game suspension for making contact with an umpire? — DAVE, Miamisburg/Centerville/Beavercreek.

A: I have several “favorite people” in baseball, but since the only one that recently served a suspension was Aaron Boone, I presume you mean him. And, no, I’m not surprised. Boone was ejected in his first game as an MLB player for the Reds when he was called out at home trying to score a run and threw his helmet. Aaron normally is a placid guy, be he has the irascible Boone genes — grandpa Ray Boone, father Bob Boone and brother Bret Boone, all owners of temper triggers when they felt they were wronged. As manager of the New York Yankees, it won’t be Aaron’s first ejection/suspension.

»RELATED: Votto makes trade with fan in Pittsburgh

Q: The 1982 Cincinnati Reds lost 101 games, so how does the current version of the last four years compare? — RON, Vandalia.

A: Different times, different players. The last three last-place teams never lost more than 98 and this year’s team, anchored in last place, won’t lose 98. So I’d have to say the ’82 team is secure in its place as the worst all-time Reds team. That team had fairly good pitching, but stood in the batter’s box as if it were a dark room with no windows. This year’s team can hit, usually, but the pitchers act as if they are pitching in a dark room with no windows.

Q: Former Reds second baseman Brandon Phillips is wearing No. 0 for the Boston Red Sox, so has any Cincinnati Reds player ever worn No. 0? JOHN, Oxford.

A: While a lot of players should have worn zero on their backs, based on their contributions, only two ever wore ‘0.’ The first was Ron Oester in 1997 and the ‘O’ was not a zero. It was an ‘oh,’ representing the first letter of his last name. The other was outfielder Dave Collins, who wore No. 0 in 1999. The highest numbered uniform was ’88,’ worn in 2014 by coach Freddie Benavides. But Benavides, now the first base coach, has moved up in the numerical world to 45.

»MCCOY: Who will be in Reds’ rotation in 2019?

Q: What are the chances that Joey Votto again leads the league in walks and on-base percentage, that Scooter Gennett wins the batting title and that Eugenio Suarez leads the league in home runs and RBI? — MICHAEL, Arlington, Va.

A: It is unlikely that all three will come through, but all three are in good positions right now. As of this writing, Votto leads the National League with a .418 OBP, but far below the American League leader, Mike Trout of the Angels at .456. And he’ll have a tough time catching Washington’s Bryce Harper in walks because Harper has 104 and Votto has 95. Scooter Gennett is a good bet for the batting title, which would be the first by a Reds player since Pete Rose in 1973. Gennett leads Milwaukee’s Christian Yelich .322 to .315. It isn’t likely Suarez will win the home run title, but he is tied with Chicago’s Javier Baez for the RBI lead at 100. Based on who bats ahead of them in the order, I’m wagering on Baez. One thing, though. All those great offensive numbers by the Reds have meant nothing to them in the standings.

Q: Assuming Nick Senzel is healthy next year and ready for the big leagues, what will the Reds infield look like with Eugenio Suarez, Jose Peraza and Scooter Gennett on the roster? — GREG, Beavercreek.

A: First of all, Senzel will have to prove in spring training that he is healthy after missing the entire second half of this season. Second of all, he will have to show he is ready for The Show. He only played 44 games for Class AAA Louisville and hit .310 with six homers and 25 RBI. That’s a small sample and I will be stunned if he doesn’t start next season at Louisville. That means the Reds infield will be the same — Suarez at third, Peraza at shortstop, Gennett at second. If Senzel shows he is ready the first couple of months at Triple-A, then the Reds have a problem. But it’s a good problem. Better too much than too little, right?

»RELATED: Do the Reds have money to spend?

Q: You have often written about your favorite eating establishments on the road while a beat writer, so I wonder what are the favorite Cincinnati restaurants for visiting beat writers and players? — RON, Lebanon.

A: It starts and ends with the Montgomery Inn-Boathouse. I hear visiting writers and players talk with salivating mouths about the ribs. Also on their list is Jeff Ruby’s steakhouse and The Precinct steakhouse. And they like to sample the Cincinnati-style chili at Skyline. What they don’t like is the media dining room at Great American Ball Park, a place I’ve avoided for four years. On most nights after batting practice I walk down the street to Ruth’s Chris Steakhouse for their Happy Hour $9 meals of steak sandwiches or hamburgers or chicken sandwiches or spicy shrimp.

Q: No matter the situation, Milwaukee manager Craig Counsell is shown in the dugout with a scowl on his face, so I wonder if that means his job is on the line? — TOM, Springfield.

A: As former NFL coach Bum Phillips once said, “There are two kinds of coaches – those who have been fired and those who are going to get fired.” That fits baseball managers, too. They all know it. So what do they have to worry about? With his recent success, Counsell seems safe. His scowl is part of his persona. He doesn’t smile until the last pitch and the smile only comes when they win. Check any manager in any dugout and count the smiles. Not many.

»RELATED: What are the Reds plans for Matt Harvey?

Q: Can you think of a contract with a worse return than Homer Bailey? It has to be worse than Barry Zito’s because he at least helped in the postseason. MIKE, Fairborn.

A: Ah, Barry Zito. In 2007 the San Francisco Giants signed him to a seven-year $110 million deal, very similar to Homer Bailey’s deal. In those seven years he went 68-80. And he was 15-8 in his next-to-last season. That’s not great, but it’s not terrible. It probably wasn’t worth $119 million. But his return was much more than the Reds have received from the injury-plagued Bailey since he signed his six-year $105 million deal. For the first five years he is 18-32 and counting.